Where were you when the collective hearts of terps fans was shattered?
I don't care much for the Terps, nor am I or was I under the delusion that they were an elite team. Yes, people had high hopes since Kansas was out... but I still realistic and expected the Terps to fail, as they always have in recent memory. I was at a driving range... enjoying the awesome weather, and as I walk into the club house to get a drink, I see the last dagger shot, and I crack up laughing... Only because earlier at my church, everyone was talking about final four and what not... I got so many dirty looks. Anyways, my condolences Terps.
Monday, March 22, 2010
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Is our world getting better or worse?
I'm just reading some news and it started me a thinking.... We, as human beings, are supposedly getting smarter... adapting... evolving... The reason why I say supposedly is because it seems like now, more than ever, do I hear about stories where people are so dumb that you don't understand how someone can be so dumb at this day in age. Example: Why a school principal would think that it would be "ok" to publicly post the students who got an "F" on the internet? I mean, I would think that any principal would know that roles and responsibilities of their job, as I do, as any person who has ever held a job knows. And there is a large difference between doing something stupid by mistake, and doing something stupid while you have convinced yourself or blindly believe that the idea is a smart one. And you see this everywhere! However, this is not the only degeneration occurring.
More and more we find that not only is the number of perverts, crazies, wackos, and weirdos increasing, but they are seemingly getting more and more depraved... on top of that, some of the worst are people who hold positions of power...
It just seems that no matter where I look, I see the world getting worse and worse on the individual level... immorality, bad ethics, stupidity, depravity... and all the while, we take a few people's progress and spread it across millions, giving us the illusion of improving as a whole. In effect, a small group actually improves while the rest drag each other down, fighting for the "dribblings" of wealth from that small group, whether it be intellectual or financial, where it is in then "dribbled" down, rinse and repeat. The channels that facilitate these "dribbling"s are not efficient or do not possess the best-for-everyone-overall mentality, causing the resource pool of wealth to grow smaller and smaller at each consecutive level to draw from. Sigh.
I'll come back and talk sports in a bit...
More and more we find that not only is the number of perverts, crazies, wackos, and weirdos increasing, but they are seemingly getting more and more depraved... on top of that, some of the worst are people who hold positions of power...
It just seems that no matter where I look, I see the world getting worse and worse on the individual level... immorality, bad ethics, stupidity, depravity... and all the while, we take a few people's progress and spread it across millions, giving us the illusion of improving as a whole. In effect, a small group actually improves while the rest drag each other down, fighting for the "dribblings" of wealth from that small group, whether it be intellectual or financial, where it is in then "dribbled" down, rinse and repeat. The channels that facilitate these "dribbling"s are not efficient or do not possess the best-for-everyone-overall mentality, causing the resource pool of wealth to grow smaller and smaller at each consecutive level to draw from. Sigh.
I'll come back and talk sports in a bit...
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Random
I dont have much time to write, so Ill just throw in some random thoughts real quick on a variety of topics. First off Tiger Woods coming back in April for the Masters. Thank God, he needs to come back and he needs to start winning again. Im not going to say that he will win his first tournament back, let alone a major, but I will say that I think this could be very strategic on his part. First off, there are only about 15 people in the world that can beat Tiger in general, let alone Augusta. Since the Masters is by invitation only, he doesnt have to beat a field of 120. Also since the Masters is private, there will no distractions from the media interrogating Tiger about his extra marital affairs. Im sure it will be on his mind and eventually he will talk about it, but at least here he can try to think about golf and not about the 20 women or Elin hitting him with a 9 iron. I dont think he will win, but if he does I dont think words can describe it. Maybe better than the US Open win with 1 leg? Tiger owns Augusta, and if he can make the cut, watch out for him on the weekend, I say top 10 finish no matter what.
Ovie still shouldnt have been suspended even if the NHL wants to make an example of him. Cooke from the Penguins didnt get jack shit and basically knocked the guy out with a grade 2 concussion that could have ended his career. But Campbell says oh well he didnt leave his feet, it was a clean hit. Cooke is one of the dirtiest if not the dirtiest player in the NHL. Look at all his past videos of hurting players deliberately, no one can say that oh he didnt mean to do that, yet the NHL allows this to regularly happen. I think its more because its the Penguins and they are the "face" of the NHL when in reality they can go fuck themselves. I hate Pittsburgh and everything about them. Whats good now in Pittsburgh? Oh yea, a rapist I forgot. The NHL will only lose out in this battle giving everything they can to Pitt and frowning upon the Caps. Your only going to piss Ovie off more and he will dismantle you when he plays against you so keep suspending him, and when he knocks Crosby out with a clean hit.. we will see whose laughing then.
Did anyone see the clip with Agassi and Sampras at the charity event? Kinda funny... hehe
Ovie still shouldnt have been suspended even if the NHL wants to make an example of him. Cooke from the Penguins didnt get jack shit and basically knocked the guy out with a grade 2 concussion that could have ended his career. But Campbell says oh well he didnt leave his feet, it was a clean hit. Cooke is one of the dirtiest if not the dirtiest player in the NHL. Look at all his past videos of hurting players deliberately, no one can say that oh he didnt mean to do that, yet the NHL allows this to regularly happen. I think its more because its the Penguins and they are the "face" of the NHL when in reality they can go fuck themselves. I hate Pittsburgh and everything about them. Whats good now in Pittsburgh? Oh yea, a rapist I forgot. The NHL will only lose out in this battle giving everything they can to Pitt and frowning upon the Caps. Your only going to piss Ovie off more and he will dismantle you when he plays against you so keep suspending him, and when he knocks Crosby out with a clean hit.. we will see whose laughing then.
Did anyone see the clip with Agassi and Sampras at the charity event? Kinda funny... hehe
Inconsistency
It's the inconsistency between punishments and rulings that make me really hate league/sport administrators. I hate that player's status will affect the punishment they receive, sometimes it helps, and sometimes it doesn't. For example...
In Ovie's case, it did not help. They wanted to use him as an example, trying to send the message that no matter who you are, they won't condone anything remotely close to what the rule was specifically created for. And yes, I agree that Ovie did nothing wrong, but at the same time, it was dangerous and as a result they make that correlation between what Ovie did and what the rule was supposedly created for. For hockey, it's harder than most other sports, because of not only the stigma it comes with, but also who the fan base is made up of, and the history that the sport is built upon. Fights and hard board checks are what people go to hockey games for. That's why people say that a hockey game's atmosphere is probably the best out of all sports, cause of the intensity, and the fact that at any moment, someone can drop their gloves and knock-someone-the-fuck-out. So I'll give the NHL more leeway than others...
In the recent NASCAR situation, Carl Edwards got into an accident with another drive... non-intentional... went to the pit, got his car fixed, and got back on the track. Once back on the track tho, he sought out the driver that was involved in the earlier accident... the other driver was in contention also... in the top 10... and then he maliciously caused the other driver's car to go airborne, into the safety grandstand fence, and then lands upside down. Now, don't get me wrong, accidents happen all the time in NASCAR, which again, is the big reason/draw to watching a lame ass race. But this is extremely dangerous. People's lives are on the line... and not just the athletes, because they know the risks they take, but fans could have been killed or horribly injured. But all he gets is a slap on the wrist because, NASCAR can't afford to have one of it's bigger stars suspended for the season. And it's not even that he intentionally caused the accident, but it wasn't while trying to win, since he had no chance of winning, and it wasn't based off of anything that the other person did wrong, as replays clearly show that the first accident was Edwards' fault.
So shit like that just pisses me off. It's like the age old legal conundrum, why the punishment for 1 gram of crack is 10 times worse than the punishment for 1 gram of coke, even though crack is made from coke. Inconsistencies and the fact that these rules set by the leagues, tho they are suppose to be enforced equally, are enforced "subjectively" and for the best interest of said league. Just as the severity of crack punishment laws can be traced back to racial roots. I won't elaborate, but it's not hard to find the correlation between the involved parties in the two difference situations.
One of the biggest inconsistency that comes to mind is the whole Pete Rose and McGwire argument, which was made in January and Vince's Response.
Other things on my mind I want to touch on when I have more time...
Homer's post on Tiger and Athlete affairs
NCAA
More Draft stuff
NFL off-season moves
Soccer
and getting ready for golf... hell yea!
NEW ALERT!!!
News Alert: Tiger Woods will return to golf at Masters
11:25 AM EDT Tuesday, March 16, 2010
--------------------
Tiger Woods announced Tuesday that he will return to golf at the Masters in Augusta, Ga., in three weeks. The tournament will be held April 8-11. Woods has not played since last fall, when a scandal erupted concerning his extramarital affairs.
NEW ALERT!!!
News Alert: Tiger Woods will return to golf at Masters
11:25 AM EDT Tuesday, March 16, 2010
--------------------
Tiger Woods announced Tuesday that he will return to golf at the Masters in Augusta, Ga., in three weeks. The tournament will be held April 8-11. Woods has not played since last fall, when a scandal erupted concerning his extramarital affairs.
Monday, March 15, 2010
Campbell likes fairies
Id first like to say how the NHL is starting to become more and more of a pussy league. They want to allow fist fighting but when it comes to a "push" and the guy gets hurt because he cant skate correctly and falls into the boards to end up missing the rest of the season, I guess that calls for a suspension. You cant have it both ways. Yes, I am talking about Colin Campbell, the NHL's disciplinary chairmen and his stance on suspending Ovie for 2 games. They call him a repeat offender.. he did nothing wrong. He pushed the guy trying to finish a check and the defender got hurt. Ovie is too big, too talented, too "Russian" for the NHL and sadly they are ruining the biggest name star of this game. Crosby is too much of a girl to start checking and being physical, but they want this to be some ice skating show and not have any physicality in the game. Why dont you just give the Cup to the Penguins and there gay ass fan base. Go Russia, Go Caps, enough said.
Friday, March 12, 2010
Tiger's Return
I wouldn't say I'm an avid golf fan... But I will watch 3 hours of grass-growing when Tiger is playing. He's probably the reason why most non-fans of golf will actually sit down and watch cause it's greatness in action.
The issues he's had off the the golf course is definitely a fall from grace. Tiger tumbled from God-like status to a down-and-out sympathy seeker. But seriously though, I would venture to say that 50% of all pro athletes have extra marital affairs. That's just my guess. It maybe blown out of proportion just because of all the stories you hear on the news.
He needs to get back to work and I want to watch.
The issues he's had off the the golf course is definitely a fall from grace. Tiger tumbled from God-like status to a down-and-out sympathy seeker. But seriously though, I would venture to say that 50% of all pro athletes have extra marital affairs. That's just my guess. It maybe blown out of proportion just because of all the stories you hear on the news.
He needs to get back to work and I want to watch.
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Quick Response to Homer
"Homer - I just wanna say that... I love your show. I listen all the time and... I love you guys. I just wanna say
that the skins should keep Campbell for another year and let him develop under a competent coach.
The FA quarterbacks this year aren't great and really not worth trading picks. We should at least wait
out on Philly's Kevin Kolb when they realise no one's gonna give up a first rounder. And yes. OT with
the number 4 pick!"
I forgot to address that topic... Campbell is not a bad quarterback. BUT, he has not yet shown that he is a good one either. I feel like they should keep Campbell, don't go after Bradford or Claussen, but rather try to get a QB in a later round to groom, work with, and take a gamble on. I honestly believe, that Tebow has a chance to be something special in the NFL. Not necessarily at QB, but when you take into consideration his accomplishments and his work ethic, it would lead one to believe that he can change his throwing mechanics enough to compete in the NFL. I do agree that the college version of him dominated, but that will not transfer over to the pros. If he can make some small changes, he can do well. He's a winner and that's not something you can teach... but then again, that's what they said about Campbell. Vince Young is an example of someone in college who did well and whose game doesn't necessarily fit the NFL mold, but is still somehow making it working for them and their team... or maybe it was because he had a 2000+ yard rusher. Either way, I think that Tebow definitely has a chance to be a good QB, and if not, at the very least, a good football player. But Tebow isn't the only non-first round QB that has talent and could be viewed as a project. So, maybe that should be the route we take... keep Campbell, let him work with Shanahan and see if we can be made into an Elway-esk QB. Or atleast give him the chance to be evaluated by Shanahan and judgment passed on how he tries to run his system, rather than his body of work where he has had different coaches, systems, and coordinators.
As for Kevin Kolb... I had him on my franchise team in madden... i hate him... That aside, he's not necessarily that great either. He has a stacked offensive team, where he doesn't need to make plays so much as get the ball into the hands of playmakers. So I veto Kolb.
that the skins should keep Campbell for another year and let him develop under a competent coach.
The FA quarterbacks this year aren't great and really not worth trading picks. We should at least wait
out on Philly's Kevin Kolb when they realise no one's gonna give up a first rounder. And yes. OT with
the number 4 pick!"
I forgot to address that topic... Campbell is not a bad quarterback. BUT, he has not yet shown that he is a good one either. I feel like they should keep Campbell, don't go after Bradford or Claussen, but rather try to get a QB in a later round to groom, work with, and take a gamble on. I honestly believe, that Tebow has a chance to be something special in the NFL. Not necessarily at QB, but when you take into consideration his accomplishments and his work ethic, it would lead one to believe that he can change his throwing mechanics enough to compete in the NFL. I do agree that the college version of him dominated, but that will not transfer over to the pros. If he can make some small changes, he can do well. He's a winner and that's not something you can teach... but then again, that's what they said about Campbell. Vince Young is an example of someone in college who did well and whose game doesn't necessarily fit the NFL mold, but is still somehow making it working for them and their team... or maybe it was because he had a 2000+ yard rusher. Either way, I think that Tebow definitely has a chance to be a good QB, and if not, at the very least, a good football player. But Tebow isn't the only non-first round QB that has talent and could be viewed as a project. So, maybe that should be the route we take... keep Campbell, let him work with Shanahan and see if we can be made into an Elway-esk QB. Or atleast give him the chance to be evaluated by Shanahan and judgment passed on how he tries to run his system, rather than his body of work where he has had different coaches, systems, and coordinators.
As for Kevin Kolb... I had him on my franchise team in madden... i hate him... That aside, he's not necessarily that great either. He has a stacked offensive team, where he doesn't need to make plays so much as get the ball into the hands of playmakers. So I veto Kolb.
State of Affairs...
Today's topic... Redskins.
First I'd like to start with how annoyed I am of a lot of the sports writers' comments and opinions... and it's not that I don't think that they should have their opinion, but why do they have to be so damn cliche? And here's what I mean:
"Redskins Fans aren't use to what their seeing from the usually free-spending franchise."
I know that last season and seasons in the past, Redskins have made big moves and have spent a lot of money, and at the same time, there have off-seasons (even recent ones), where the Redskins have not spent a lot of money. Take for example, the off-season before last, the one before the signing of Haynesworth. That was a very low key off-season for us as well. All I'm saying is, that I'm tired of reading the same cliche phrases. It's like they all have a database that they pull their supposedly whimsical banter from. And the skill to create such alleged banter is the premise to why they are a sports writers, different from us average sports fans, is it not?
Released:
Randy Thomas, G - I'm not sure how much money he would be making this year, but if it wasn't high, I would have considered keeping him around for two reasons: so that we aren't in a horrible corner or lose negotiating powers without having another G on the roster, and as a back-up (since our O-line is so thin as it is, veteran back-ups are not a bad idea).
Cornelius Griffin, DT - This is understandable, since they are probably going to switch to a 3-4 defense, and Cornelius is not young and he isn't able to eat-up 2 blocks.
Antwaan Randle El, WR/PR - Thank goodness this guy is gone. GTFO and stay out.
Rock Cartwright, KR/RB - Rock wasn't a bad KR, but he wasn't a good one. All Rock did was run forward and thru people. If he couldn't run thru you... well he's got nothing else.
Fred Smoot, CB - I'm somewhat on the fence on this one. Let's not consider his contract for now, let's weigh everything else. Fred Smoot is a decent #2 CB and a pretty good nickel/#3CB. Now that being said, for his skill set, it wouldn't have been bad to keep him, to play either of those roles, in case of injury or what not. I know that Smoot is no spring chick, but he can definitely help out in those roles for atleast 1 more year. And who really trusts Carlos Rogers?*
Ladell Betts, RB - Betts wasn't a bad RB, he just wasn't a good one.
Todd Collins, QB - He's old, but who else do we have as a back-up?
Marcus Mason, RB - He played well when he had a chance to. I'm not sure I would have let him go if I just let go 2 vet RBs.
Eddie Williams, FB - We have to start thinking about life after Mike Sellers, or preparing for his years to catch up to him. Maybe should have kept this one around too.
J.D. Skolnitsky, DE - Who are you? Go away.
*And to Carlos Rogers. Apparently, you are upset that they put a tender on you as a restricted free agent. UPSET?!?! Really?! I'm upset that you suck. I'm upset that we wasted a high draft pick on you. I'm upset that you can't catch a ball when it hits you in your chest. I'm upset that you will and can never be a #1 CB. I'm upset that I have you on my team and not someone, anyone, from the first round of your draft class. So until you start displaying some semblence of skill, STFU.
Resigned:
Phillip Daniels, DE - I like this, he could definitely be in the rotation in a 3-4. Powerlifter... I like it.
Mike Williams, OL - We need some O-line on the roster, can't draft every O-line position. He's an interesting story though. 4th overall pick, obscenely obese, fall from grace, and now a second chance. Does he realize his potential that he once displayed?
Casey Rabach, C - Solid guy, he's also getting up in age, so we'll have to think about an understudy, but definitely good for the short term.
Lorenzo Alexander, DL/LB/OL - I like his versatility. Definitely an asset to have. Especially now that he's being moved to LB, a position we are a bit thin in to run a 3-4 defense.
Signed:
Artis Hicks, G - I like this move. Trying to improve the O-line.
Maake Kemoeatu, NT - Big guy, hopefully he can come back from his injury and help make our D-line dominant.
Sean Ryan, TE - Not sure about this one... is it for special teams? Is it a precursor to Cooley or Davis getting traded? We sure do have a lot of TEs
I've probably missed a person here or there but whatever.
I was a bit surprised about some of our activities or lack thereof. I think that we should have pursued some people, such as Peppers (tho i understand why we didn't), Daunta Robinson or some other good CB, offensive lineman, and linebackers. I thought we would be more involved in pursuing players of high caliber in those positions. I hope that Shanahan has a plan.
Here's a few things I've been thinking about in relation to the draft:
If Bradford is taken first, and either Eric Berry or one of the DTs fall to us, do we take them?
This I think might be the most ideal situation for us. Because, it's almost a win-win. Having one of those 3 fall to us gives us a lot of power. Many teams would love to have a shot at landing any of those 3 players. We could trade the pick with a team that has two 1st rounders or we could swap it with a lower first rounder and take their 2nd rounder. And if no one wants to trade up, taking any of those players would help out the team, tho maybe not a need, but would help set the position for years to come, especially Eric Berry. I personally would love to have Eric Berry on the team, for all the comparisons he draws, it makes me want to have an elite safety on my team again, RIP Sean Taylor. That being said, trading down would probably be the best. If we trade down and acquire another pick, we could get an OT, this draft class isn't necessarily deep in that position, but they do have a lot of OTs with a lot of talent... As well as address other holes, such as the LB situation, or we can even draft another safety, as this draft class also has a lot of talented safetys in the first round. McClain would be a very good addition as well.
If not, who do we draft at 4?
If all goes as it is suppose to, I would suggest taking the best OT here. It meets the biggest need, and should be the player with the highest value that does not have certain question marks. Bradford - Will he be able to come back from his injury and improve? Claussen is a reach here, so OT is probably the right pick. But I really hope to trade this pick to acquire more. That's the dream.
Questions:
What will happen to Andre Carter, will he do well in a 3-4? Is he going to play LB or DE?
There will be more to come, but please, let me know what you think. Any ideas you might have or opinions that aren't cliche that you'd like to share.
First I'd like to start with how annoyed I am of a lot of the sports writers' comments and opinions... and it's not that I don't think that they should have their opinion, but why do they have to be so damn cliche? And here's what I mean:
"Redskins Fans aren't use to what their seeing from the usually free-spending franchise."
I know that last season and seasons in the past, Redskins have made big moves and have spent a lot of money, and at the same time, there have off-seasons (even recent ones), where the Redskins have not spent a lot of money. Take for example, the off-season before last, the one before the signing of Haynesworth. That was a very low key off-season for us as well. All I'm saying is, that I'm tired of reading the same cliche phrases. It's like they all have a database that they pull their supposedly whimsical banter from. And the skill to create such alleged banter is the premise to why they are a sports writers, different from us average sports fans, is it not?
Released:
Randy Thomas, G - I'm not sure how much money he would be making this year, but if it wasn't high, I would have considered keeping him around for two reasons: so that we aren't in a horrible corner or lose negotiating powers without having another G on the roster, and as a back-up (since our O-line is so thin as it is, veteran back-ups are not a bad idea).
Cornelius Griffin, DT - This is understandable, since they are probably going to switch to a 3-4 defense, and Cornelius is not young and he isn't able to eat-up 2 blocks.
Antwaan Randle El, WR/PR - Thank goodness this guy is gone. GTFO and stay out.
Rock Cartwright, KR/RB - Rock wasn't a bad KR, but he wasn't a good one. All Rock did was run forward and thru people. If he couldn't run thru you... well he's got nothing else.
Fred Smoot, CB - I'm somewhat on the fence on this one. Let's not consider his contract for now, let's weigh everything else. Fred Smoot is a decent #2 CB and a pretty good nickel/#3CB. Now that being said, for his skill set, it wouldn't have been bad to keep him, to play either of those roles, in case of injury or what not. I know that Smoot is no spring chick, but he can definitely help out in those roles for atleast 1 more year. And who really trusts Carlos Rogers?*
Ladell Betts, RB - Betts wasn't a bad RB, he just wasn't a good one.
Todd Collins, QB - He's old, but who else do we have as a back-up?
Marcus Mason, RB - He played well when he had a chance to. I'm not sure I would have let him go if I just let go 2 vet RBs.
Eddie Williams, FB - We have to start thinking about life after Mike Sellers, or preparing for his years to catch up to him. Maybe should have kept this one around too.
J.D. Skolnitsky, DE - Who are you? Go away.
*And to Carlos Rogers. Apparently, you are upset that they put a tender on you as a restricted free agent. UPSET?!?! Really?! I'm upset that you suck. I'm upset that we wasted a high draft pick on you. I'm upset that you can't catch a ball when it hits you in your chest. I'm upset that you will and can never be a #1 CB. I'm upset that I have you on my team and not someone, anyone, from the first round of your draft class. So until you start displaying some semblence of skill, STFU.
Resigned:
Phillip Daniels, DE - I like this, he could definitely be in the rotation in a 3-4. Powerlifter... I like it.
Mike Williams, OL - We need some O-line on the roster, can't draft every O-line position. He's an interesting story though. 4th overall pick, obscenely obese, fall from grace, and now a second chance. Does he realize his potential that he once displayed?
Casey Rabach, C - Solid guy, he's also getting up in age, so we'll have to think about an understudy, but definitely good for the short term.
Lorenzo Alexander, DL/LB/OL - I like his versatility. Definitely an asset to have. Especially now that he's being moved to LB, a position we are a bit thin in to run a 3-4 defense.
Signed:
Artis Hicks, G - I like this move. Trying to improve the O-line.
Maake Kemoeatu, NT - Big guy, hopefully he can come back from his injury and help make our D-line dominant.
Sean Ryan, TE - Not sure about this one... is it for special teams? Is it a precursor to Cooley or Davis getting traded? We sure do have a lot of TEs
I've probably missed a person here or there but whatever.
I was a bit surprised about some of our activities or lack thereof. I think that we should have pursued some people, such as Peppers (tho i understand why we didn't), Daunta Robinson or some other good CB, offensive lineman, and linebackers. I thought we would be more involved in pursuing players of high caliber in those positions. I hope that Shanahan has a plan.
Here's a few things I've been thinking about in relation to the draft:
If Bradford is taken first, and either Eric Berry or one of the DTs fall to us, do we take them?
This I think might be the most ideal situation for us. Because, it's almost a win-win. Having one of those 3 fall to us gives us a lot of power. Many teams would love to have a shot at landing any of those 3 players. We could trade the pick with a team that has two 1st rounders or we could swap it with a lower first rounder and take their 2nd rounder. And if no one wants to trade up, taking any of those players would help out the team, tho maybe not a need, but would help set the position for years to come, especially Eric Berry. I personally would love to have Eric Berry on the team, for all the comparisons he draws, it makes me want to have an elite safety on my team again, RIP Sean Taylor. That being said, trading down would probably be the best. If we trade down and acquire another pick, we could get an OT, this draft class isn't necessarily deep in that position, but they do have a lot of OTs with a lot of talent... As well as address other holes, such as the LB situation, or we can even draft another safety, as this draft class also has a lot of talented safetys in the first round. McClain would be a very good addition as well.
If not, who do we draft at 4?
If all goes as it is suppose to, I would suggest taking the best OT here. It meets the biggest need, and should be the player with the highest value that does not have certain question marks. Bradford - Will he be able to come back from his injury and improve? Claussen is a reach here, so OT is probably the right pick. But I really hope to trade this pick to acquire more. That's the dream.
Questions:
What will happen to Andre Carter, will he do well in a 3-4? Is he going to play LB or DE?
There will be more to come, but please, let me know what you think. Any ideas you might have or opinions that aren't cliche that you'd like to share.
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Is it just me?
Or do you find this equally as retarded as I do... Rick needs to shut up
I don't care what the ranking was... when Wake Forest beat UNC... I mean... the eventual NCAA CHAMPIONS... yes I'll say it again... Champions!!! you have a right to storm the court. Besides... they are UNC, one of the most winningest programs in the country... you don't want to celebrate?
I hate when old people try to ruin the joy of youth by telling them what isn't appropriate... i bet 10 to 1 odds... if he was still in college, and they beat UNC, he would have been one of the first to storm the court. So Rick... STFU.
P.S. You are not funny Rick...
I don't care what the ranking was... when Wake Forest beat UNC... I mean... the eventual NCAA CHAMPIONS... yes I'll say it again... Champions!!! you have a right to storm the court. Besides... they are UNC, one of the most winningest programs in the country... you don't want to celebrate?
I hate when old people try to ruin the joy of youth by telling them what isn't appropriate... i bet 10 to 1 odds... if he was still in college, and they beat UNC, he would have been one of the first to storm the court. So Rick... STFU.
P.S. You are not funny Rick...
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)